A Company

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 14 July 2006

"Let click fraud happen"? Uh, no.

Posted on 07:58 by Unknown
Posted by Shuman Ghosemajumder, Business Product Manager for Trust & Safety

You may have seen some of the media coverage generated by a blogger's quoting Eric Schmidt about click fraud. By using select excerpts and ignoring the context of the remarks, that blog post made for an interesting read, but was unfortunately misleading.

Eric spoke at a SIEPR economics event at Stanford in March. At the end of his remarks he took questions. (You can view the whole presentation and Q&A that followed here.)

Here's the relevant question Eric was asked about click fraud: "Recently there’s been some talk about click fraud being a potential threat to the entire advertising business model. I was just wondering what your thoughts on that were and if there’s an economic solution to it more than just technical solutions."

Eric made clear from the very beginning that he wasn't describing our approach to click fraud and was answering hypothetically. He introduced his answer by saying: "Let’s imagine for purposes of argument that click fraud were not policed by Google and it were rampant ..."

The "let it happen" excerpt followed, in which he discusses the economic forces that can retard click fraud: "Eventually the price that the advertiser is willing to pay for the conversion will decline because the advertiser will realize that these are bad clicks. In other words, the value of the ad declines. So, over some amount of time, the system is, in fact, self-correcting. In fact, there is a perfect economic solution, which is to let it happen."

But he made clear that we don't take that approach, by adding that click fraud is "a bad thing and because we don’t like it, and because it does, at least for the short-term, creates some problems before the advertiser sees it, we go ahead and try to detect it and eliminate it." He also said, "In Google's case, we worry about this a lot and we have a number of technical engineers who think that this is great fun to try to go ahead of this and get ahead of it."

The fact is that Google strives to detect every invalid click that passes through its system, and to prevent those clicks from ever reaching an advertiser's account. And Eric and many others at Google have discussed the problem of invalid clicks publicly many times -- on our quarterly earnings calls, at our Press Day, and in other places, such as blogs. Anyone who has followed Google knows that Eric, and others at Google, have stated several times that Google fights invalid clicks, that we've devoted significant resources to manage it, and that we take it very seriously.

Update: Added link to the original story.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in ads, policy and issues | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • About that fake post
    Posted by Karen Wickre, Google Blog team A bug in Blogger enabled an unauthorized user to make a fake post on the Google Blog last night, cl...
  • On the alert for bloggers
    Posted by Naga Sridhar Kataru, Software Engineer So many interesting blogs and so little time! If you're anything like me, you like to p...
  • OneBox for all your corporate information
    Posted by Dave Girouard, VP, Enterprise We added OneBox functionality to our Google Search Appliance today, which means you can now find j...
  • It’s all about the photos
    Posted by Adrian Graham, Product Manager Reading feedback from Picasa users is one of the best parts of my job. And lately the feedback has ...
  • Buzz about Google Print and the lawsuit
    Posted by Adam M. Smith, Product Manager "Making all the Google Print facts clear really does make a difference." That's the h...
  • The rebirth of cool
    Posted by Silas Reyes, Webmaster, Mobile team Have you ever been involved in a project that you've seen evolve from an idea to a work in...
  • We' re turning 1....
    Posted by the Gmail team ...and to celebrate our birthday, we're giving all Gmail users another gigabyte of space, and then some. And ye...
  • Bookmark this site
    We talk a lot about our mission to "organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful," and we th...
  • Google does Grimsby, Gateshead and Glasgow
    Posted by Richard Boardman, Usability Analyst Sometimes it's hard being a Brit in Silicon Valley. Have you tried to find a decent pint, ...
  • And we're back
    Posted by Jason Goldman, Blogger Product Manager The Google Blog was unavailable for a short time tonight. We quickly learned from our initi...

Categories

  • accessibility
  • ads
  • Africa
  • apps
  • April 1
  • Asia
  • books + book search
  • crisis response
  • developers
  • doodles
  • education and research
  • enterprise
  • Europe
  • free expression
  • google.org
  • googlers and culture
  • green
  • health
  • Latin America
  • mobile
  • online safety
  • personalization
  • photos
  • policy and issues
  • privacy
  • recipe
  • recruiting and hiring
  • scholarships
  • search
  • search trends
  • small business
  • user experience and usability
  • youtube and video

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2006 (231)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ▼  July (18)
      • Google Earth and Katrina help
      • Summer health tips
      • Make your own buttons
      • Lane's Gifts settlement ruling
      • A roadmap for Google help
      • London conference on test automation
      • Corporate info on the go
      • Home on the road
      • Saving the galaxy, one traffic jam at a time
      • Findings on invalid clicks
      • Update: Google Desktop Gadget Contest
      • Finding easy-to-read web content
      • Stocking up
      • "Let click fraud happen"? Uh, no.
      • Code Jamming in Dublin
      • Tour de France goes 3D with Google Earth
      • Armchair travel with Google Pack
      • We get letters (4)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2005 (199)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2004 (58)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile