A Company

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 8 March 2006

Update: Lane’s Gifts v. Google

Posted on 13:58 by Unknown
Posted by Nicole Wong, Associate General Counsel

You may remember that last February, Google was sued in Arkansas over what is commonly called click fraud. We’re very near a resolution in that case, so we thought we’d offer an update.

We’ve been discussing the case with the plaintiffs for some time and have recently come to an agreement with them which we believe is a good outcome for everyone involved. As a result, Google and the plaintiffs are going to ask the judge to approve the settlement, which would resolve the case.

Until the settlement is approved by the judge, it is not final. And the details are confidential, but will become public when it is formally filed for the judge’s consideration. However, we can share the major pieces of our proposed agreement.

Google currently allows advertisers to apply for reimbursement for clicks they believe are invalid. They can do this for clicks that happen during the 60 days prior to notifying Google. Under the agreement with the plaintiffs, we are going to open up that window for all advertisers, regardless of when the questionable clicks occurred. For all eligible invalid clicks, we will offer credits which can be used to purchase new advertising with Google. We do not know how many will apply and receive credits, but under the agreement, the total amount of credits, plus attorneys fees, will not exceed $90 million.

This agreement covers all advertisers who claim to have been charged but not reimbursed for invalid clicks dating from 2002 when we launched our “cost per click” advertising program through the date the settlement is approved by the judge.

For the finance folks out there wondering how we’ll account for this, we can say that the attorneys’ fees (which will be determined by the judge) will be charged as an expense, most likely in the first quarter, once the amount is determined. The credits will be recorded as a reduction to revenue in periods in which they are redeemed.

We have said for some time that we believe we manage the problem of invalid clicks very well. We have a large team of expert engineers and analysts devoted to it. By far, most invalid clicks are caught by our automatic filters and discarded *before* they reach an advertiser’s bill. And for the clicks that are not caught in advance, advertisers can notify Google and ask for reimbursement. We investigate those clicks, and if we determine they were invalid, we reimburse advertisers for them. We will continue to do that, and believe that this settlement is further proof of our willingness to work together with advertisers to reimburse invalid clicks.

You can find more information on invalid clicks and how we manage them here or here.

Update: Added second link to more information.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in ads, policy and issues | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • About that fake post
    Posted by Karen Wickre, Google Blog team A bug in Blogger enabled an unauthorized user to make a fake post on the Google Blog last night, cl...
  • On the alert for bloggers
    Posted by Naga Sridhar Kataru, Software Engineer So many interesting blogs and so little time! If you're anything like me, you like to p...
  • OneBox for all your corporate information
    Posted by Dave Girouard, VP, Enterprise We added OneBox functionality to our Google Search Appliance today, which means you can now find j...
  • Racking up an honor
    We're five years old and already they're sticking us in a museum. The Computer History Museum, to be precise, a neighbor of ours her...
  • TechnoServe comes to Google
    Posted by Posted by Bruce McNamer, President and CEO, TechnoServe.org The Google Foundation supports select organizations whose work addres...
  • About Google.org
    Posted by Sheryl Sandberg, VP, Global Online Sales & Operations When we told prospective shareholders about Google and how we wanted to ...
  • We' re turning 1....
    Posted by the Gmail team ...and to celebrate our birthday, we're giving all Gmail users another gigabyte of space, and then some. And ye...
  • News + Suggest join forces
    Posted by Jon McAlister, Software Engineer I've always been a big fan of both Google News and Google Suggest . So in my 20% time, I...
  • Day off for Dennis
    Posted by Rupert van Millingen, Google UK From time to time, we like to reflect the world we live in through the logo designs on our home pa...
  • Easier web page creation
    Posted by Justin Rosenstein, Product Manager, Google Page Creator My mother wanted a site for her law practice that potential clients would ...

Categories

  • accessibility
  • ads
  • Africa
  • apps
  • April 1
  • Asia
  • books + book search
  • crisis response
  • developers
  • doodles
  • education and research
  • enterprise
  • Europe
  • free expression
  • google.org
  • googlers and culture
  • green
  • health
  • Latin America
  • mobile
  • online safety
  • personalization
  • photos
  • policy and issues
  • privacy
  • recipe
  • recruiting and hiring
  • scholarships
  • search
  • search trends
  • small business
  • user experience and usability
  • youtube and video

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2006 (231)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ▼  March (20)
      • Doing what they love, the rest follows
      • TechnoServe update: New program in Ghana
      • Kick this
      • And we're back
      • Google Reader learns to share
      • Expanding girls' horizons
      • Mac Gmail Notifier update
      • Spring is the season for love (and data)
      • Judge tells DoJ "No" on search queries
      • Courtside seats, without the court... or the seat
      • Stay in Ctrl Ctrl
      • A new home for @Last Software
      • Mars attracts
      • Pug-speak
      • Writely so
      • Update: Lane’s Gifts v. Google
      • A real find
      • Google News Israel
      • Robots and writers and Googlers, oh my!
      • The littlest Mini
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2005 (199)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2004 (58)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile