A Company

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 8 November 2005

Vint Cerf speaks out on net neutrality

Posted on 13:21 by Unknown
Posted by Alan Davidson, Washington Policy Counsel, DC office

Congress is holding a hearing tomorrow, Wednesday, November 8th, on "network neutrality" and a big new telecommunications bill affecting the Internet. Vint Cerf, our net neutrality guru, was unable to testify because of a little awards ceremony at the White House (congratulations, Vint!), but here is his letter to the Hill outlining our concerns. Microsoft will be testifying for our side, demonstrating that inside the Beltway, we agree on a lot.

You can follow the proceedings here -- and we hope you do. This bill could fundamentally alter the fabulously successful end-to-end Internet.


November 8, 2005

The Honorable Joe Barton
Chairman
Committee on Energy and Commerce
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515

The Honorable John D. Dingell
Ranking Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairman Barton and Ranking Member Dingell,

I appreciate the inquiries by your staff about my availability to appear before the Committee and to share Google’s views about draft telecommunications legislation and the issues related to "network neutrality." These are matters of great importance to the Internet and Google welcomes the Committee’s hard work and attention. The hearing unfortunately conflicts with another obligation, and I am sorry I will not be able to attend. (Along with my colleague Robert Kahn, I am honored to be receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom on Wednesday at the White House for our work in creating the Internet protocol TCP/IP.)

Despite my inability to participate in the planned hearing in person, I hope that you will accept some brief observations about this legislation.

The remarkable social impact and economic success of the Internet is in many ways directly attributable to the architectural characteristics that were part of its design. The Internet was designed with no gatekeepers over new content or services. The Internet is based on a layered, end-to-end model that allows people at each level of the network to innovate free of any central control. By placing intelligence at the edges rather than control in the middle of the network, the Internet has created a platform for innovation. This has led to an explosion of offerings – from VOIP to 802.11x wi-fi to blogging – that might never have evolved had central control of the network been required by design.

My fear is that, as written, this bill would do great damage to the Internet as we know it. Enshrining a rule that broadly permits network operators to discriminate in favor of certain kinds of services and to potentially interfere with others would place broadband operators in control of online activity. Allowing broadband providers to segment their IP offerings and reserve huge amounts of bandwidth for their own services will not give consumers the broadband Internet our country and economy need. Many people will have little or no choice among broadband operators for the foreseeable future, implying that such operators will have the power to exercise a great deal of control over any applications placed on the network.

As we move to a broadband environment and eliminate century-old non-discrimination requirements, a lightweight but enforceable neutrality rule is needed to ensure that the Internet continues to thrive. Telephone companies cannot tell consumers who they can call; network operators should not dictate what people can do online.

I am confident that we can build a broadband system that allows users to decide what websites they want to see and what applications they want to use – and that also guarantees high quality service and network security. That network model has and can continue to provide economic benefits to innovators and consumers -- and to the broadband operators who will reap the rewards for providing access to such a valued network.

We appreciate the efforts in your current draft to create at least a starting point for net neutrality principles. Google looks forward to working with you and your staff to draft a bill that will maintain the revolutionary potential of the broadband Internet.

Thank you for your attention and for your efforts on these important issues.

Sincerely,

Vinton Cerf
Chief Internet Evangelist
Google Inc.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in policy and issues | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • About that fake post
    Posted by Karen Wickre, Google Blog team A bug in Blogger enabled an unauthorized user to make a fake post on the Google Blog last night, cl...
  • A year of Google blogging
    Posted by Karen Wickre, Google Blog team This is the 201st post to be published on the Google Blog in 2005. In closing out the first full ye...
  • Domains of choice
    In the realm of the Internet, there's no shortage of acronyms for all the parts of a web address. Top-level domains like .com, .org and ...
  • Buzz about Google Print and the lawsuit
    Posted by Adam M. Smith, Product Manager "Making all the Google Print facts clear really does make a difference." That's the h...
  • The rebirth of cool
    Posted by Silas Reyes, Webmaster, Mobile team Have you ever been involved in a project that you've seen evolve from an idea to a work in...
  • More ways to connect and share with Google Talk
    Posted by Mike Jazayeri, Google Talk Product Manager Millions of you use Google Talk every day to connect with friends, family, and colleagu...
  • On the alert for bloggers
    Posted by Naga Sridhar Kataru, Software Engineer So many interesting blogs and so little time! If you're anything like me, you like to p...
  • Stress: the holiday Grinch
    From time to time, the resident physician at Google headquarters weighs in with her thoughts on healthy living. This is not medical advice, ...
  • Defending the future of books
    Posted by Laura DeBonis, Library Partnerships Director, Google Book Search team On Monday, University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman...
  • O, Canada (among others)
    Posted by Dylan Parker, Software Engineer I've been working on the personalized homepage from Victoria, B.C., and I've never been ps...

Categories

  • accessibility
  • ads
  • Africa
  • apps
  • April 1
  • Asia
  • books + book search
  • crisis response
  • developers
  • doodles
  • education and research
  • enterprise
  • Europe
  • free expression
  • google.org
  • googlers and culture
  • green
  • health
  • Latin America
  • mobile
  • online safety
  • personalization
  • photos
  • policy and issues
  • privacy
  • recipe
  • recruiting and hiring
  • scholarships
  • search
  • search trends
  • small business
  • user experience and usability
  • youtube and video

Blog Archive

  • ►  2006 (231)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ▼  2005 (199)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ▼  November (20)
      • How I Got to Google, Ch. 2: Tale of a T-shirt
      • Lots to Talk about!
      • Thanks Victoria doodlers!
      • Don't drop while you shop
      • Wi-Fi in Mountain View
      • Get News in Portuguese
      • Judging Book Search by its cover
      • Knowledge is power
      • First Base
      • A man with a phone in Nantucket ...
      • The circle of analytics
      • The breakfast business
      • Vint Cerf speaks out on net neutrality
      • Search and replace
      • Get lost and found on your phone
      • Standing on the shoulders of this giant
      • Desktop grows up
      • Preserving public domain books
      • O, Canada (among others)
      • Flu season is upon us
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2004 (58)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile