A Company

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 13 October 2005

Financial reporting: the alphabet soup

Posted on 06:01 by Unknown
Posted by Mark Fuchs, Chief Accountant

Warning: Financial reporting minutiae below. Proceed with caution.

We're going to provide a bit more information with our October 20 earnings announcement. In this and future announcements, we're going to include a so-called pro-forma, or non-GAAP, diluted earnings per share (EPS) number as a supplement to our GAAP EPS number.

In the past, we've only provided GAAP EPS. But because Wall Street analysts typically estimate and describe our results with non-GAAP EPS numbers, that resulted in some confusing apples-to-oranges analyses of our results. (By the way, we review non-GAAP results when we analyze our own performance.) By providing both, we hope it will be easier to understand our results.

Now, if you’ve got your green eyeshade handy, read on. What follows is in accountant-speak.

Earnings per share is calculated by dividing profit (net income) by the number of outstanding shares. That's GAAP. To compute our non-GAAP EPS, we’ll add back to our net income things such as charges for stock-based compensation. (Before adding back stock-based compensation – or other certain charges – we’ll factor in related taxes. What does that mean? When we add back a charge, we subtract the tax benefit related to it that we would get under GAAP accounting. In other words, in the non-GAAP calculation we don't want to include the GAAP tax benefit.) After tax-affecting the charges and then adding them back to net income, we'll take that sum, divide it by outstanding shares and come up with our non-GAAP EPS number.

To illustrate all of this with a fictitious example, let's assume these imaginary data points:
  • GAAP net income - $300 million
  • Stock-based compensation charge - $100 million (note that other charges in addition to stock-based compensation may be excluded from the computation and presentation of our non-GAAP results as appropriate in the future)
  • Tax affect of stock based compensation charge - $35 million
  • Shares outstanding for Google - 600 million
To get our GAAP EPS, we would simply divide $300 million GAAP net income by the 600 million shares outstanding and arrive at a GAAP EPS of $0.50.
$300,000,000 / 600,000,000 = $0.50
Now, to get the non-GAAP EPS, we would:
  1. Subtract the $35 million tax affect from the $100 million stock-based compensation charge to arrive at $65 million
  2. Add that $65 million to the $300 million GAAP net income for a new, non-GAAP net income of $365 million
  3. Divide $365 million by 600 million shares outstanding and get a non-GAAP EPS of $0.61.
($300,000,000 + ($100,000,000 - $35,000,000)) / 600,000,000 = $0.61
As if this weren't complicated enough, we should note that most, if not all, analysts have historically computed our non-GAAP earnings by adding stock-based compensation to net income without tax-affecting the charge. As a result, when we provide our non-GAAP EPS number, we may be adding back less to compute our non-GAAP earnings than will most of the analysts.

Using the same set of imaginary numbers, analysts might, for example:
  1. Add the full $100 million stock-based compensation charge to the GAAP net income of $300 million and arrive at their non-GAAP net income of $400 million
  2. Divide that by outstanding shares and arrive at non-GAAP EPS (for the fictitious example, $0.67 per share)
($300,000,000 + $100,000,000) / 600,000,000 = $0.67
Congratulations to those of you who were able to make it this far. We're sorry for the density, but this is dense stuff and we've got to be comprehensive in our explanation of it.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in googlers and culture | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • About that fake post
    Posted by Karen Wickre, Google Blog team A bug in Blogger enabled an unauthorized user to make a fake post on the Google Blog last night, cl...
  • A year of Google blogging
    Posted by Karen Wickre, Google Blog team This is the 201st post to be published on the Google Blog in 2005. In closing out the first full ye...
  • Domains of choice
    In the realm of the Internet, there's no shortage of acronyms for all the parts of a web address. Top-level domains like .com, .org and ...
  • Buzz about Google Print and the lawsuit
    Posted by Adam M. Smith, Product Manager "Making all the Google Print facts clear really does make a difference." That's the h...
  • The rebirth of cool
    Posted by Silas Reyes, Webmaster, Mobile team Have you ever been involved in a project that you've seen evolve from an idea to a work in...
  • More ways to connect and share with Google Talk
    Posted by Mike Jazayeri, Google Talk Product Manager Millions of you use Google Talk every day to connect with friends, family, and colleagu...
  • On the alert for bloggers
    Posted by Naga Sridhar Kataru, Software Engineer So many interesting blogs and so little time! If you're anything like me, you like to p...
  • Stress: the holiday Grinch
    From time to time, the resident physician at Google headquarters weighs in with her thoughts on healthy living. This is not medical advice, ...
  • Defending the future of books
    Posted by Laura DeBonis, Library Partnerships Director, Google Book Search team On Monday, University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman...
  • O, Canada (among others)
    Posted by Dylan Parker, Software Engineer I've been working on the personalized homepage from Victoria, B.C., and I've never been ps...

Categories

  • accessibility
  • ads
  • Africa
  • apps
  • April 1
  • Asia
  • books + book search
  • crisis response
  • developers
  • doodles
  • education and research
  • enterprise
  • Europe
  • free expression
  • google.org
  • googlers and culture
  • green
  • health
  • Latin America
  • mobile
  • online safety
  • personalization
  • photos
  • policy and issues
  • privacy
  • recipe
  • recruiting and hiring
  • scholarships
  • search
  • search trends
  • small business
  • user experience and usability
  • youtube and video

Blog Archive

  • ►  2006 (231)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ▼  2005 (199)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ▼  October (20)
      • Discovering hard-to-find books
      • More video to watch!
      • Saying thank you with pictures
      • A must-see TV archive
      • Rumor of the day
      • Supporting open source
      • Guess what just turned 34?
      • Why we believe in Google Print
      • The point of Google Print
      • We get letters (3)
      • Our ongoing privacy efforts
      • More Firefox-Toolbar synchronicity
      • Financial reporting: the alphabet soup
      • About Google.org
      • Bird flu basics
      • The Green Goddess beckons
      • Feed the world
      • Google goes to Washington
      • How I got to Google, ch. 1
      • A Friday visit to the database of intentions
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2004 (58)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile